미국에서 경영윤리를 듣고 있는 학생입니다. 삼일안으로 페이퍼를 내야하는데 어떻게 접근해야 할지 모르겠습니다. 도와주세요. 아래는 페이퍼에 대한 질문입니다. 두가지 다른 시각으로 이사람이 어떻게 해야하는가에 대해 써야하는데 두가지 시각이 무엇인지 이해가 가지 않네요. 간단히 말하면 두가지 입장이 어떻게 다른건가요? 주말인데 갑자기 도와달라고 해서 죄송하지만 너무 급해서 이렇게 글을 남기니 양해해주세요.
George, who has just taken his Ph.D. in chemistry, finds it difficult to get a job. He is not robust in health, which cuts down the number of jobs he might be able to do. His wife has to work, which causes a great deal of strain, since they have small children. The results of all this,especially on the children, are damaging. An older chemist says that he can get George a decently paid job in a laboratory which pursues research into chemical warfare. George says that he cannot accept this, since he is opposed to chemical warfare. The older man replies that he is not too keen on it himself, but George’s refusal is not going to make the job or the laboratory go away; what is more, if George refuses the job, it will certainly go to a contemporary of George’s who is not inhibited by such scruples and is likely to push the research with greater zeal than George would.What should George do? (from Utilitarianism for and Against by J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams) Answer this question, one from the Utilitarian perspective and one from the Deontological perspective. |
|
처음으로
