¼­¿ï´ë öÇаú ´ëÇпø ÀԽà ±âÃâ ¹®Á¦µé

 


¿©±â¼­´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ´ëÇпø ÀÔÇнÃÇè ¹®Á¦¸¦ ¿¹½ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿©·¯ºÐµéÀº "¾ÆÇÏ, ÀÌ·± ÇüÅ·Π¹®Á¦°¡ ÃâÁ¦µÇ´Â±¸³ª!"ÇÏ°í Âü°íÇϽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù. ¼®»ç°úÁ¤ÀÇ ¹®Á¦µµ °°Àº À¯ÇüÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Áï ³í¼úÇüÀ̶ó´Â ¸»¾¸ÀÌÁÒ.
´õ Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ¼¼ºÎÀûÀÎ Á¤º¸´Â Á÷Á¢ ¸¸³ª¼­ ¾ê±â¸¦ µå¸®ÁÒ.
(±âÃâ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ¸¹ÀÌ ¾Ë¾Æ¼­, ¸¶Ä¡ ´ëÇÐÀԽø¦ º¸µíÀÌ ÂÊÁý°Ô·Î °øºÎÇÏ·Á ÇÏ´Ù°¡´Â ½ÇÆÐÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±âÃâ¹®Á¦¿¡ ¿¬¿¬ÇØ ÇÏÁö ¸¶¼¼¿ä.)


1996Çг⵵ ´ëÇпø ½ÅÀÔ»ý 2Â÷ ¸ðÁý ÀÔÇаí»ç Àü°ø°ú¸ñ ¹®Á¦Áö(¹Ú»ç°úÁ¤)

 

´ÙÀ½ ´Ù¼¸ ¹®Á¦ Áß ¼ÂÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ¿© ´äÇϽÿÀ.

1)ÇöóÅæ¿¡¼­ ¸ñÀû·ÐÀû ¼³¸í°ú Idea·ÐÀÇ ¿¬°üÀ» ³íÇϽÿÀ.

2) HobbesÀÇ »çȸ°è¾à·ÐÀ» ³íº¯ÀÇ ÇüÅ·ΠÁ¤¸®ÇÏ°í ±×¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºñÆÇÀûÀ¸·Î ³íÇϽÿÀ.

3) '»ç½Ç'(ÞÀãù)À̶õ ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡¸¦ ±ÔÁ¤ÇØ º¸½Ã¿À.

4) ¹°ÁúÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀ̳ĸ¦ ¹àÈ÷´Âµ¥ °úÇÐÀÌ ¸¹Àº ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù´Â °ÍÀº ÁÖÁöÀÇ »ç½ÇÀÌ´Ù. ±× ·¸´Ù¸é ¸¶À½ÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀ̳ĸ¦ ¹àÈ÷´Â µ¥µµ °úÇÐÀÌ ¾î¶² ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀϱî? ºñÆÇÀûÀ¸·Î °íÂûÇϽÿÀ.

5) Èʼ³ÀÇ 'Intention' °³³ä°ú ÇÏÀ̵¥°ÅÀÇ 'Sorge' °³³äÀ» ºñ±³¡¤°ËÅäÇϽÿÀ.

 

<Çؼ³>

3->Ä­Æ®

4->ÀÎÁö°úÇÐ


 


1999Çг⵵ ´ëÇпø ½ÅÀÔ»ý Á¤½Ã¸ðÁý ÀÔÇаí»ç Àü°ø°ú¸ñ ¹®Á¦Áö(¹Ú»ç°úÁ¤)

 

´ÙÀ½ÀÇ ¹®Á¦ Áß¿¡¼­ 3¹®Á¦¸¦ ¼±ÅÃÇÏ¿© ´äÇϽÿÀ.

1. ÇüÀÌ»óÇÐÀû »çÀ¯°¡ ½ÇÁõÁÖÀdzª À¯¹°·ÐÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ºñÆǹ޴ ÀÌÀ¯°¡ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö ³íÇϽÿÀ.

2. ÀÚÀ¯ÁÖÀÇ¿Í °øµ¿Ã¼ÁÖÀÇ °£ÀÇ ³íÀïÁ¡À» Çѱ¹Àû ½Ã°¢¿¡¼­ ³í¼úÇϽÿÀ.

3. This was our parados ; no course of action could be determined by a rule, because every course of action can be made out to accord with the rule. The answer was; if everything can be made out to accord with the rule, then it can also be made out to conflict with it. And so there would be neither accord nor conflict here.

It can be seen that there is a misunderstanding here from the mere fact that in the course of our argument we give one interpretation after anolther; as if each ohne contended us at least for a momnet, until we thought of yet another standing behind it. What this shews is that there is a way of grasping a rule which is not an intepretation, but which is exhibited in what we call "obeying the rule" and "going against it" in actual cases.

Hence there is an inclination to say: every action according to the rule is an interpretation. But we ought to restrict the term "interpretation" to the substitution of one expression of the rule for another.

ÀÌ ±ÍÀý¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³­ "Paradox"°¡ ¾î¶»°Ô ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀΰ¡¸¦ "interpretation"°ú ¿¬°ü½ÃÄÑ ¹à È÷½Ã¿À. ´õ ³ª¾Æ°¡ paradox°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸·Á¸é ¾î¶»°Ô ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀΰ¡¸¦ WittgensteinÀÇ 'form of life' °³³ä°ú ¿¬°üÇؼ­ ³íÇϽÿÀ.

4. Æĸ£¸Þ´Ïµ¥½ºÀÇ Ã¶Çаú ¼ÒÇǽºÆ® »ç»óÀÇ ¿¬°üÀ» ³íÇϽÿÀ.